As it stands, I don't expect to survive this Trump term. Figure January 20, 2029 at the latest. Until then it all depends. For now be happy for me that I've lived long enough to be this disgusted. In 1983 I took the breakup of my marriage so hard I tried to kill myself twice in one month (I should've been more careful); now I'm waiting for the start of yet another four years of societal meltdown. The PATRIOT Act should have been enough, but now some morons have voted for Trump three times when they should've known better. What fresh hell will your world throw me into next?
2:50 PM EST would be too early to start drinking yet if I hadn't gone on naltrexone and been good for a year, and I don't feel any real need to do so, so I won't. it's cheaper that way. I didn't feel like I had to drink last night either, it's just that I've been disgusted with life and too wintered out to feel like doing any of the better things that'd be on my list if I'd bothered to make one.
Last night I had about two shots of 50% ABV rye whisky and half a 4.5% can of porter. That took about 90 minutes to imbibe. My tolerance is still very low and thanks to the naltrexone getting really smashed wouldn't have been any fun, beyond a certain point it feels like the poison it is, so it's so far so good; I got a slight buzz and stopped in the middle of a perfectly good beer, so not only did I not get a hangover I didn't even get dizzy standing up. I gather that's what naltrexone is supposed to do, keep it optional and non-problematic. To go back to hard-core boozing I'd have to go off naltrexone, which is free to me, while decent whiskey costs about $20 a bottle.
I stopped boozing last year because I couldn't afford it, and drinking like I had been is still not cost-effective. Note that I can now afford to drink as ethanol as I was doing, though so far it'd have to be cheap-ass vodka instead of the "surprisingly good for the price" whiskey I prefer; that's my idea of degeneracy, a point I'd rather not go past yet.
Luckily for me alcohol is cheap, common, and legal, so I have that $10 a gallon vodka option to fall back on, and unlike him I don't consider it weakness to seek help for my problems if lowering myself that far still seems like a bad idea.
So far it still seems that if I took a poll on whether those whom it may concern would rather see me become a degenerate drunk or just get it over with, with those being the only choices I've give you, most of you would rather see with crippling alcoholism (there's even a subreddit for that) than put myself out of everybody's misery. That still seems like a fucked up priority to me, given what's a fucked up situation in the first place , but then I avoided becoming a crippled drunk last year by drying out, and then lucked into a 30%-of-my-income apartment.
Last year my obvious "or else" was giving up living inside and going to a place like California to be a tipsy derelict. I wasn't quite ready to murder myself and I did have a plan to make being homeless bearable -- joining a gym to shower and work out, finding a safe place to camp away from fentanyl junkies, etc., -- but fortunately I was able to find a way to dry out for as long as need be that didn't involve any of that Twelve Step bullshit that's on my "die rather than commit" list of sins so that's what I did.
And it worked. For a while.
But October 2023 was still over a year before the next Presidential election, and putting up with this world you give me to live in didn't seem totally pointless. But y'all normies had to go and crown Cheetoman again, which would make being homeless (drunk or not) even harder than it was last year; from what I understood about what those people had to put up with in 2020 I've decided I'd really rather not. Now you've done it: you've made being homeless sound worse than death to somebody who used to consider homelessness rather inconvenient but not a disgraceful tragedy. It's hard enough to foresee a worthwhile future in my life as it currently is.
Forty years ago, when Reagan had just gotten elected to a second term, people would reassure me that my dread of the future was a paranoid exaggeration, that the American people were too smart to let things keep getting worse. In 1984 people told me a situation like Trump's first term was extremely unlikely. But 40 years ago you also didn't expect the Patriot Act, or the 20 Years War, or a global pandemic. It would never come to that, normal people said. "Stop being paranoid -- and maybe go on medication."
How could the US electorate even allow Trump to get nominated in 2016? What so great about a "democracy" that would let something like that happen?
Cippola's Third Basic Law of Stupidity is this: "a stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses."
Keep in mind that we're not talking only about Trump base here, we're talking about Trump being on the Presidential ballot AT ALL. Say what you will about the Founding Fathers, but when the Constitution was written they simply could not imagine a situation when the American people would let such a raving moron run for President.
One good thing about Putin and Orban and the other autocrats of the world is at least they're not spluttering idiots. Hell, as dictators go Xi Jinping is not as horrible as Mao, for example.
You've really fucked me over this time. The only question is how soon it will get really bad. I've already stopped reading the news for the most part, shutting myself off even further from the world around me; I've already decided that total abstinence from alcohol (and 5/$1.29 cigars) is more trouble than it's worth. You've shown me that aiming for limitless longevity is ridiculously silly, in fact four more years of things as they are now might well be too much to put myself through.
And y'all tell me there's something wrong with my brain.
You people disgust me.